The short answer
Yes, and the usual cause is a cost segregation study you paid for years ago. Section 1245(b)(4) limits the ordinary income to your recognized gain plus the fair market value of everything you acquire that is not section 1245 property, and a replacement building is not section 1245 property, so that ceiling is high enough to let the full section 1245 recapture through even when the exchange is otherwise fully deferred. The exchange itself is not spoiled; the character of part of the gain changes. Section 1250 works the opposite way, which is why the surprise is almost always on the 5- and 7-year components.
At a glance
| The statute | §1245(b)(4): recapture capped at gain recognized plus FMV of non-§1245 property bought |
|---|---|
| Why that ceiling is high | A replacement building is §1250 property, so its whole value counts toward the cap |
| Cash required | None. Zero boot does not reduce §1245 ordinary income by itself |
| §1250 contrast | §1250(d)(4): buying §1250 property of equal value usually drives the limit to zero |
| Usual culprits | 5- and 7-year cost-seg items, plus bonus depreciation taken on QIP |
| Exchange still valid | Reg §1.1031(a)-3(a)(7): §1245 status does not stop the property being real property |
| Reporting | Form 8824 line 21 → Form 4797 line 16; basis split on lines 25a and 25b |
| Rate | §1245 recapture is ordinary income at your marginal rate, not 25% or 20% |
The ceiling in §1245(b)(4) counts the replacement building against you, not for you
Read the limitation and the problem is visible on the page. Where gain is not recognized in whole or in part under section 1031, the ordinary income "shall not exceed the sum of — (A) the amount of gain recognized on such disposition ... plus (B) the fair market value of property acquired which is not section 1245 property."
Most exchangers assume clause (B) protects them. It does the reverse. Everything you buy that is not section 1245 property enlarges the ceiling, and an ordinary building, a DST interest in one, or a net-leased store is section 1250 property, not section 1245 property.
The only thing that lowers the ceiling is acquiring section 1245 property of your own. Buy a replacement carrying no section 1245 basis and the cap is effectively the whole purchase price, so the full section 1245 recapture is let through.
The IRS's own Form 8824 example recaptures $50,000 on a deal that produced $40,000 of cash
The Instructions for Form 8824 carry a worked example that makes the point better than any commentary. Taylor exchanges an apartment building worth $220,000 and receives a $250,000 building plus $40,000 cash, having previously allocated basis to assets that are section 1245 property.
In the variant where Taylor's section 1245 assets carried $50,000 of allowed or allowable depreciation, the instructions compute the limit as "$290,000, which is the total of ... $40,000 (Gain Recognized)" and "$250,000 (FMV non-section 1245 property received)." Taylor therefore reports the whole $50,000 as ordinary income — $10,000 more than the cash received.
Delete the $40,000 of cash from that example and the ceiling is still $250,000. The recapture is unchanged. That is the whole answer to this page's question.
Section 1250 is the mirror image, which is why nobody warns you about it
The same IRS example runs the section 1250 side for the other party, Finley, who had taken $35,000 of depreciation above straight line on qualified improvement property. The section 1250(d)(4) limit is "the greater of" the gain recognized or the excess of the potential recapture over the fair market value of section 1250 property received.
Finley's excess was "$0: ($35,000 ... reduced, but not below zero, by $165,000 (FMV Section 1250 property received))", so the ordinary income was held to the $30,000 of recognized gain and no further.
That asymmetry is the trap. Buying like-kind real estate shelters your section 1250 exposure automatically and does nothing at all for your section 1245 exposure.
Which slices of a cost segregation study are the §1245 ones
Not every line in the study is dangerous, and sorting them before you identify is the practical step.
Section 1245 property under §1245(a)(3) is personal property and certain non-building tangible property; it expressly excludes "a building or its structural components."
- 5- and 7-year items reclassified as personal property — carpeting, cabinetry, decorative lighting, dedicated equipment wiring — are the section 1245 exposure.
- 15-year land improvements such as paving, fencing and site lighting are section 1250 property, so they fall under the friendlier limit.
- Bonus depreciation on qualified improvement property creates section 1250 additional depreciation, which Form 4797 defines as depreciation "including any special depreciation allowance" above straight line.
- Structural components depreciated over 27.5 or 39 years carry no exposure at all on a straight-line schedule.
- Genuine personal property left in the building, such as appliances and furniture, is not like-kind at all and is separate boot.
Nothing about this disqualifies the exchange — Reg §1.1031(a)-3(a)(7) says so outright
It is worth being clear about what is and is not at risk, because owners often fear the whole exchange is unwinding.
The regulation states that "a structure or a portion of a structure may be section 1245 property for depreciation purposes and for determining gain under section 1245, notwithstanding that the structure or the portion of the structure is real property under this section", and that a taxpayer transferring section 1245 relinquished property "is subject to the gain recognition rules under section 1245 ... notwithstanding that the relinquished property or replacement property is real property."
So the deferral holds for everything else. Only the section 1245 slice changes character, and what does actually disqualify an exchange is covered separately.
What to ask for before day 45, and how to shop for §1245 basis
Because the fix is on the buy side, it has to happen before you identify rather than at tax time. Ask your CPA for the section 1245 basis and allowed-or-allowable depreciation on the property you are selling, expressed as one number.
Then ask each replacement for its purchase price allocation. A DST sponsor's offering documents and the trust's own cost segregation work, where it exists, will show how much of the acquisition price sits in personal-property-type assets, and that figure is what shrinks the ceiling. How to read a DST offering for this kind of detail is set out here.
Where the number is unavoidable, plan for the cash. Section 1245 recapture is ordinary income at your marginal rate rather than 25%, so it can cost more per dollar than the gain you are deferring, and a partial exchange that deliberately releases some cash is sometimes the cleaner answer. Confirm the allocation and the resulting tax with your CPA before you commit to a replacement.
Where it lands on the return: line 21, line 16, and the basis split on 25a and 25b
Form 8824 line 21 is captioned "Ordinary income under recapture rules. Enter here and on Form 4797, line 16", and Form 4797 line 16 is captioned "Ordinary gain or (loss) from like-kind exchanges from Form 8824." That is the whole path.
Line 23 then adds lines 21 and 22, and line 24 reports what remains deferred, so recapture recognized now reduces your deferred gain rather than adding to it.
Finally, lines 25a and 25b split your replacement basis between section 1250 and section 1245 property received, in amounts the instructions require to be "proportionate to their FMVs." Filling the form out for a straightforward exchange is walked through here.
Related questions
I never ran a cost segregation study. Am I exposed?
Almost certainly not on the section 1245 side. Without a study your basis sits in structural components depreciated straight line, which are section 1250 property and are protected by the limit in section 1250(d)(4).
Can I just skip the cost segregation allocation on my return?
No. Form 8824 asks for depreciation "allowed or allowable", so the deductions count whether or not you now report them, and the study is already in your depreciation schedules.
Does buying a DST with a hotel or senior housing asset help?
It can, because operating assets typically carry more personal-property-type basis than a net-leased box, but only the offering's own allocation proves it. Asset class choices inside DSTs are compared here.
Is this ordinary income also subject to the 3.8% surtax?
Recognized gain on a rental generally is net investment income, so it can carry the surtax as well as your marginal rate. The surtax rules on a rental sale are here.
Does the recapture reduce the money I have to reinvest?
No. The tax is owed with your return, not at closing, so the full proceeds still go through the qualified intermediary and you fund the tax from elsewhere.
Sources
Checked against these publications on September 19, 2026. Rules and figures change; confirm the current version with your CPA or attorney before you act. This page is general information, not tax or legal advice.
- 26 U.S.C. §1245(a)(3) and §1245(b)(4) (Cornell LII)
- 26 U.S.C. §1250(d)(4) (Cornell LII)
- 26 CFR §1.1031(a)-3, real property and the no-inference rule
- IRS Instructions for Form 8824, lines 21 to 25
- IRS Form 8824, Like-Kind Exchanges
- IRS Form 4797, Sales of Business Property
- IRS Instructions for Form 4797, Part III
- IRS Publication 544, depreciation recapture and allocation in exchanges
